Current:Home > MarketsFTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse -GrowthProspect
FTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse
View
Date:2025-04-14 02:10:04
If the Federal Trade Commission has its way, businesses could soon be fined a hefty sum for hosting or promoting fake product reviews online.
Faux five-star and rave reviews of less-than-stellar consumer goods can boost businesses' profits while deceiving consumers, according to the agency, which has proposed a rule to crack down on companies that buy, sell or promote phony user ratings of their products. If the rule is finalized, violators would be subject to penalties of up to $50,000 per infraction, depending on the case.
"The FTC has seen a massive increase in online reviews in the past few years," Serena Viswanathan, associate director of the FTC's division of ad practices, told CBS News. "We're all using them now to make decisions on whether to buy a product, where to stay on vacation. But unfortunately, with the rise in online reviews we have seen that bad actors can manipulate or fake reviews to deceive consumers for their own benefit."
New types of artificial intelligence tools, which can write human-sounding, but bogus, product reviews, also threaten to compound the problem by enabling bad actors to crank out far more fake reviews, according to the consumer watchdog.
Deceptive reviews hurt consumers by making it hard to obtain factual information about products, regulators say.
"The FTC's proposed rule would make it crystal clear that it's illegal to do things like write or sell fake reviews from people who don't exist or never used the product, or to buy positive reviews or even buy negative reviews about your competitors," Viswanathan said.
Boosting "honest companies"
A steady stream of phony product reviews can boost an item's visibility among consumers while obscuring products from more trustworthy companies, according to experts.
"Our proposed rule on fake reviews shows that we're using all available means to attack deceptive advertising in the digital age," said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection said in a statement. "The rule would trigger civil penalties for violators and should help level the playing field for honest companies."
According to a U.S. PIRG estimate, between 30% and 40% of online reviews are "concocted or are in some way not genuine." Bogus reviews surged during the pandemic when U.S. shoppers made the bulk of their purchases over the internet versus in stores, the consumer advocacy group noted.
Nearly 90% of online shoppers rely on reviews to guide their purchase decisions, according to PIRG.
"Not only does this harm consumers who are trying to make informed buying decisions, fake reviews also hurt honest businesses who make sure their online reviews are genuine. When people lose confidence in reviews, legitimate positive reviews don't mean as much. So consumers lose. Honest businesses lose. Dishonest businesses win," PIRG said in a report.
Stopping hijackers
The FTC's proposed rule would make selling and buying fake reviews illegal, while also cracking down on a practice known as "review hijacking." This consists of repurposing a genuine consumer review written for one product so that it appears to pertain to a substantially different product.
Also under the proposed enforcement, company insiders cannot review their own products, and businesses cannot bribe people to leave positive reviews or threaten them if they leave negative reviews. Companies would be permitted to offer customers gift cards for leaving a review, so long as the business doesn't dictate what people say about a product.
"We really think that the possibility of significant financial penalties under a rule should make some of these bad actors think twice about writing fake reviews and selling fake reviews," Viswanathan said.
veryGood! (8981)
Related
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Trump’s Fuel Efficiency Reduction Would Be Largest Anti-Climate Rollback Ever
- New documentary shines light on impact of guaranteed income programs
- Michigan man arrested for planning mass killing at synagogue
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- U.S. Spy Satellite Photos Show Himalayan Glacier Melt Accelerating
- Ex-Soldiers Recruited by U.S. Utilities for Clean Energy Jobs
- Bob Huggins resigns as West Virginia men's basketball coach after DUI arrest in Pittsburgh
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Carbon Footprint of Canada’s Oil Sands Is Larger Than Thought
Ranking
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Big Three Automaker Gives Cellulosic Ethanol Industry a Needed Lift
- Trump’s EPA Fast-Tracks a Controversial Rule That Would Restrict the Use of Health Science
- Amid Doubts, Turkey Powers Ahead with Hydrogen Technologies
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Sickle cell patient's success with gene editing raises hopes and questions
- Several States Using Little-Known Fund to Jump-Start the Clean Economy
- Why Chrishell Stause and G Flip's Wedding Won't Be on Selling Sunset
Recommendation
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
What's driving the battery fires with e-bikes and scooters?
How well does a new Alzheimer's drug work for those most at risk?
Fans Think Bad Bunny Planted These Kendall Jenner Easter Eggs in New Music Video “Where She Goes”
Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
Frozen cells reveal a clue for a vaccine to block the deadly TB bug
What is Babesiosis? A rare tick-borne disease is on the rise in the Northeast
Fight Over Fossil Fuel Influence in Climate Talks Ends With Murky Compromise